Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 47(5): 257-266, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36621347

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the sequelae one month after hospital discharge in patients who required admission to Intensive Care for severe COVID 19 pneumonia and to analyze the differences between those who received therapy exclusively with high-flow oxygen therapy compared to those who required invasive mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Cohort, prospective and observational study. SETTING: Post-intensive care multidisciplinary program. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Patients who survived admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for severe COVID 19 pneumonia from April 2020 to October 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Inclusion in the post-ICU multidisciplinary program. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Motor, sensory, psychological/psychiatric, respiratory and nutritional sequelae after hospital admission. RESULTS: 104 patients were included. 48 patients received high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (ONAF) and 56 invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The main sequelae found were distal neuropathy (33.9% IMV vs 10.4% ONAF); brachial plexopathy (10.7% IMV vs 0% ONAF); decrease in grip strength: right hand 20.67kg (±8.27) in VMI vs 31.8kg (±11.59) in ONAF and left hand 19.39kg (±8.45) in VMI vs 30.26kg (±12.74) in ONAF; and limited muscle balance in the lower limbs (28.6% VMI vs 8.6% ONAF). The differences observed between both groups did not reach statistical significance in the multivariable study. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained after the multivariate study suggest that there are no differences in the perceived physical sequelae one month after hospital discharge depending on the respiratory therapy used, whether it was high-flow nasal oxygen therapy or prolonged mechanical ventilation, although more studies are needed to be able to draw conclusions.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/terapia , Alta do Paciente , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial , Cuidados Críticos , Oxigênio , Hospitais
2.
Med Intensiva ; 47(5): 257-266, 2023 May.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36506823

RESUMO

Objective: To describe the sequelae one month after hospital discharge in patients who required admission to intensive care for severe COVID-19 pneumonia and to analyze the differences between those who received therapy exclusively with high-flow oxygen therapy compared to those who required invasive mechanical ventilation. Design: Cohort, prospective and observational study. Setting: Post-intensive care multidisciplinary program. Patients or participants: Patients who survived admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for severe COVID-19 pneumonia from April 2020 to October 2021. Interventions: Inclusion in the post-ICU multidisciplinary program. Main variables of interest: Motor, sensory, psychological/psychiatric, respiratory and nutritional sequelae after hospital admission. Results: One hundred and four patients were included. 48 patients received high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (ONAF) and 56 invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The main sequelae found were distal neuropathy (33.9% IMV vs. 10.4% ONAF); brachial plexopathy (10.7% IMV vs. 0% ONAF); decrease in grip strength: right hand 20.67 kg (± 8.27) in VMI vs. 31.8 kg (± 11.59) in ONAF and left hand 19.39 kg (± 8.45) in VMI vs. 30.26 kg (± 12.74) in ONAF; and limited muscle balance in the lower limbs (28.6% VMI vs. 8.6% ONAF). The differences observed between both groups did not reach statistical significance in the multivariable study. Conclusions: The results obtained after the multivariate study suggest that there are no differences in the perceived physical sequelae one month after hospital discharge depending on the respiratory therapy used, whether it was high-flow nasal oxygen therapy or prolonged mechanical ventilation, although more studies are needed to be able to draw conclusions.

5.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 92(13): 503-6, 1989 Apr 08.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2747313

RESUMO

A female with Hodgkin's disease developed graft versus host disease (GVHD) after the administration of two units of packed red cells. Ten days after the transfusion she developed fever and rash, with subsequent hepatic and intestinal disease and a profound bone marrow aplasia. She died from a Candida tropicalis sepsis. The diagnosis of GVHD was made on the basis of clinical and histological criteria. We review this uncommon complication of hemotherapy, with special emphasis on its differential clinical features and its prevention.


Assuntos
Candidíase/complicações , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Doença de Hodgkin/terapia , Reação Transfusional , Adulto , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/patologia , Doença de Hodgkin/complicações , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA